The number of packages can be removed: 18.
google-noto-sans-fonts google-noto-sans-ethiopic-fonts google-noto-sans-arabic-fonts google-noto-sans-armenian-fonts google-noto-sans-bengali-fonts google-noto-sans-tifinagh-fonts google-noto-sans-devanagari-fonts google-noto-sans-myanmar-fonts google-noto-sans-cherokee-fonts google-noto-sans-thaana-fonts google-noto-sans-tibetan-fonts google-noto-sans-georgian-fonts google-noto-gujarati-fonts google-noto-sans-hebrew-fonts google-noto-sans-canadian-aboriginal-fonts google-noto-serif-kannada-fonts google-noto-sans-khmer-fonts google-noto-sans-lao-fonts google-noto-sans-malayalam-fonts google-noto-sans-yi-fonts google-noto-sans-nko-fonts google-noto-oriya-fonts google-noto-sans-gurmukhi-fonts google-noto-sans-syriac-eastern-fonts google-noto-sans-tamil-fonts google-noto-sans-telugu-fonts google-noto-sans-thai-fonts google-noto-sans-mongolian-fonts.Overall: 165MiB increased (88MiB without serif) IMHO, we should strive to privilege as few linguistic groups as possible, and that is exactly what doesn't happen when your preferred font has massive unicode script gaps.įile size estimations is here which may affects ISO size: Picking a single, distinct from upstream font for Fedora makes sense from a branding, design, and usability perspective. I'm no type designer, so I'd love to get some feedback!Ībsolutely no disrespect intended to Nicholas. While "amateur" can have several meanings, I'm not sure there's a commonly used definition of "professional" that would apply in this case. Why would we give up on that now that the font is actually improving ?!Īnd I hope you didn't mean to imply that Nicholas is an amateur, or that fonts or software done by non-payed people is somehow inferior. (Heck, if Noto is great, why not consider just making it the Workstation font? Is this whole 'GNOME has its own font' thing really still an idea worth chasing, if we have good fonts with wide glyph coverage being maintained by professionals?)
0 kommentar(er)
